United States v. Wendell Crawford

323 F. App'x 722
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMarch 31, 2009
Docket08-12070
StatusUnpublished

This text of 323 F. App'x 722 (United States v. Wendell Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Wendell Crawford, 323 F. App'x 722 (11th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal results from Wendell Crawford’s second motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We rejected Crawford’s first motion on the grounds that Amendment 591 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines did not affect his sentence. See United States v. Crawford, 243 Fed.Appx. 476, 482 (11th Cir.2007) (per curiam). He then filed pro se this § 3582(c)(2) motion based on Amendment 706, which reduced by two levels the base offense level for certain crack cocaine offenses. Rl-390. The district court granted his motion and reduced his sentence to 235 months of imprisonment — the minimum term of his amended guideline range. 1 Rl-392.

Crawford, represented by counsel on appeal, contends that the advisory nature of the sentencing guidelines permitted the district court to impose a new sentence below the amended guideline range. This issue is now foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Melvin, 556 F.3d 1190, 1190-91 (11th Cir.2009) (per curiam) (holding that United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007), do not apply to § 3582(c)(2) proceedings and that “a district court is bound by the limitations on its discretion imposed by § 3582(c)(2) and the applicable policy statements by the Sentencing Commission”). Accordingly, we AFFIRM Crawford’s sentence.

AFFIRMED.

1

. Crawford was originally sentenced to 292 months of imprisonment for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base and possession with intent to distribute cocaine base. See Crawford, 243 Fed.Appx. at 478. We affirmed on direct appeal. See United States v. Stallworth, No. 95-3533, 121 F.3d 721 (11th Cir. July 22, 1997) (per cu-riam) (unpublished).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Wendell Crawford
243 F. App'x 476 (Eleventh Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Melvin
556 F.3d 1190 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Kimbrough v. United States
552 U.S. 85 (Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
323 F. App'x 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wendell-crawford-ca11-2009.