United States v. Webb

280 F. App'x 252
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Webb. Read the opinion of the Court — 311 F. App'x 582
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 2, 2008·No. 08-6443·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Webb appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000), seeking a reduction to his sentence based on an amendment to the sentencing guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion denying the motion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the district court.”). We dispense *253 with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Webb, 280 F. App'x 252 (4th Cir. 2008).

280 F. App'x 252 (United States v. Webb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Anthony Goines
357 F.3d 469 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)