United States v. Watkins

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Watkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 364 F. App'x 41
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 6, 2010·No. 10-7039·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7039

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DE’JUAN ANDERKO WATKINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:02-cr-00106-F-1)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

De’Juan Anderko Watkins, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

De’Juan Anderko Watkins appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a writ of audita querela. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Watkins, No. 7:02-cr-00106-F-1 (E.D.N.C. July 12,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Watkins, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Watkins (United States v. Watkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.