United States v. Watkins

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Watkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 161 F. App'x 337
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2008·No. 08-6014·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAHSAAN JAMAR WATKINS, a/k/a Robert Leon Alexander,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, Chief District Judge. (2:99-cr-00189-2)

Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 25, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rahsaan Jamar Watkins, Appellant Pro Se. Kasey Warner, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rahsaan Jamar Watkins appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to

suppress. He also challenges the denial of his second motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Watkins, No. 2:99-cr-00189-2

(S.D.W. Va. July 5 & Oct. 25, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Watkins, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Watkins (United States v. Watkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.