United States v. Washington

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 14, 2026·No. 26-10009·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 26-10009 Document: 40-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/14/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals No. 26-10009 Fifth Circuit

Summary Calendar FILED ____________ July 14, 2026 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Nicholas Washington,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:25-CR-179-1 ______________________________

Before Smith, Southwick, and Oldham, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Nicholas Washington has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Washington has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record.

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 26-10009 Document: 40-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/14/2026

No. 26-10009

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non- frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Washington, (5th Cir. 2026).

United States v. Washington (United States v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)