United States v. Washington

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2024·No. 23-60477·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 23-60477 Document: 50-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2024

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

____________ FILED April 25, 2024 No. 23-60477 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Willie Ray Washington,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:22-CR-85-1 ______________________________

Before Willett, Duncan, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Willie Ray Washington has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Washington has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-60477 Document: 50-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/25/2024

No. 23-60477

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Washington, (5th Cir. 2024).

United States v. Washington (United States v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)