United States v. Washington

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 498 F.3d 225
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 16, 2009·No. 09-7247·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7247

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TAKI MICARIO WASHINGTON, a/k/a Joey Williams,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:00-cr-00318-GBL-1)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Taki Micario Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Colin Christopher Sampson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Taki Micario Washington appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Washington, No. 1:00-cr-00318-GBL-1 (E.D. Va. filed June 17,

2009; entered June 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Washington, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Washington (United States v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related