United States v. Walton

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2008·No. 08-6188·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6188

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ERIC ARTHUR WALTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:84-cr-00100-IMK-JES-1)

Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Arthur Walton, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eric Arthur Walton appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

Walton’s motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 (applicable

to offenses committed before November 1, 1987). We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Walton, No. 1:84-cr-00100-IMK-JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 11, 2008). We

deny Walton’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Walton, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Walton (United States v. Walton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.