United States v. Walton

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Walton

365 F. App'x 511

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 19, 2010·No. No. 09-7385·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Arthur Walton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 (applicable to offenses committed before November 1, 1987). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Walton, No. 1:84-cr-00100-IMK-JES-1 (ND.W.Va. July 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Arthur Walton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 (applicable to offenses committed before November 1, 1987). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Walton, No. 1:84-cr-00100-IMK-JES-1 (ND.W.Va. July 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Walton, 365 F. App'x 511 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

365 F. App'x 511 (United States v. Walton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.