United States v. Walters

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Walters. Read the opinion of the Court — 350 F. App'x 826
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 11, 2010·No. 09-7643·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7643

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROHAN ALEXANDER WALTERS, a/k/a Dave, a/k/a Rohan Williams,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, Chief District Judge. (2:97-cr-00157-2; 2:09-cv-00589)

Submitted: April 5, 2010 Decided: May 11, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rohan Alexander Walters, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rohan Alexander Walters appeals the district court’s

order denying his petition for writ of audita querela. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Walters, Nos. 2:97-cr-00157-2; 2:09-cv-00589 (S.D. W.

Va. Aug. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Walters, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Walters (United States v. Walters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.