United States v. Walters
This text of United States v. Walters (United States v. Walters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7643
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROHAN ALEXANDER WALTERS, a/k/a Dave, a/k/a Rohan Williams,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, Chief District Judge. (2:97-cr-00157-2; 2:09-cv-00589)
Submitted: April 5, 2010 Decided: May 11, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rohan Alexander Walters, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Rohan Alexander Walters appeals the district court’s
order denying his petition for writ of audita querela. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Walters, Nos. 2:97-cr-00157-2; 2:09-cv-00589 (S.D. W.
Va. Aug. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Walters, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-walters-ca4-2010.