United States v. Walter Mitchell

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 21, 2016
• Docket: 16-6960
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6960

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WALTER MITCHELL, a/k/a June, a/k/a Junie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cr-00156-JRS-2)

Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 21, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Erik Sean Siebert, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Walter Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction

of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. See United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir.

2013) (reviewing district court’s decision under § 3582(c)(2)

for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Mitchell, No. 3:11-cr-00156-JRS-2 (E.D. Va. July 15, 2015). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED