United States v. Walter Leonardo

459 F. App'x 469
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Walter Leonardo. Read the opinion of the Court — 408 F. App'x 866
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 6, 2012·No. 10-50382·Unpublished

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM: *

The Supreme Court vacated the judgment and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Tapia v. United States, 564 U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 2382, 180 L.Ed.2d 357 (2011). The statement of the district judge at sentencing does support *470 the contention that a longer sentence was given for medical care and the law is clear now that this was error. We therefore vacate the sentence and remand for resen-tencing.

Sentence VACATED; REMANDED for resentencing.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Walter Leonardo, 459 F. App'x 469 (5th Cir. 2012).

459 F. App'x 469 (United States v. Walter Leonardo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tapia v. United States
131 S. Ct. 2382 (Supreme Court, 2011)