United States v. Wally James Daniel

459 F.2d 1029, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9725
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 5, 1972
Docket72-1201
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 459 F.2d 1029 (United States v. Wally James Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Wally James Daniel, 459 F.2d 1029, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9725 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Wally Daniel was convicted for importing and possessing marijuana and amphetamines in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) (1), 952.

Daniel argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. He contends that the only incriminating evidence was the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice. There was ample corroboration of the evidence of the accomplice. Moreover, in this circuit, a conviction may rest on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice if the testimony is not incredible or unsubstantial on its face. United States v. Andrews, 455 F.2d 632 (9th Cir. 1972); Darden v. United States, 405 F.2d 1054 (9th Cir. 1969). The testimony of Daniel’s accomplice was neither incredible nor unsubstantial.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Mitchell P.
587 P.2d 1144 (California Supreme Court, 1978)
United States v. Jack Sigal
572 F.2d 1320 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
528 F.2d 143 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Turner
528 F.2d 143 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. James Allen Hibler
463 F.2d 455 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
459 F.2d 1029, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wally-james-daniel-ca9-1972.