United States v. Wall

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7681

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RODNEY EDWARD WALL, a/k/a Sld Dft 3:99-24-9, a/k/a Big Rodney,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:99-cr-00024-FDW-9)

Submitted: February 18, 2009 Decided: February 24, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney Edward Wall, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rodney Edward Wall appeals the district court’s order

denying Wall’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Wall, No. 3:99-cr-00024-FDW-9 (W.D.N.C. Aug, 31,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED