United States v. Wall

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Wall. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 F. App'x 252
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2002·No. 01-7739·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7739

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICHMOND WALL, III,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CR-98-177-A)

Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 25, 2002

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Frederick Daum, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Justin W. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Richmond Wall seeks to appeal the district court’s order and

opinion denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Wall, No.

CR-98-177-A (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 7, 2001; entered Sept. 11, 2001).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Wall, (4th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Wall (United States v. Wall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related