United States v. Wall
This text of United States v. Wall (United States v. Wall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7739
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RICHMOND WALL, III,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CR-98-177-A)
Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 25, 2002
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Frederick Daum, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Justin W. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Richmond Wall seeks to appeal the district court’s order and
opinion denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a
certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Wall, No.
CR-98-177-A (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 7, 2001; entered Sept. 11, 2001).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Wall, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-wall-ca4-2002.