United States v. Walker

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Walker

435 F. App'x 277

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2011·No. No. 11-6603·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[278]*278Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Lamont Walker appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 36 motion to correct a clerical error in the district court’s docket sheet. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Walker’s motion to expedite decision is denied as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[278]*278Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Lamont Walker appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 36 motion to correct a clerical error in the district court’s docket sheet. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Walker’s motion to expedite decision is denied as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Walker, 435 F. App'x 277 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

435 F. App'x 277 (United States v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related