United States v. Wade

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6851

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JONATHAN WAYNE WADE,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:95-cr-00005-FDW-9)

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 30, 2009

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Wayne Wade, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Wayne Wade appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion, which was

based on the recent crack cocaine amendments to the sentencing

guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Wade, No. 3:95-cr-00005-FDW-9

(W.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED