United States v. Vira Rivera

473 F.2d 1372
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 7, 1972
Docket72-2441
StatusPublished

This text of 473 F.2d 1372 (United States v. Vira Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Vira Rivera, 473 F.2d 1372 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

473 F.2d 1372

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Vira RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. M-72-8049 (72-2441).

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 7, 1972.

Henry W. Sands, in pro. per.

James W. Meyers, Asst. U. S. Atty., for the United States.

Before CHAMBERS and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After notice and a hearing, Henry W. Sands, a member of the bar of this court, is assessed a penalty of Five Hundred Dollars under Rule 46(c), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, for failure to prosecute the appeal of Vira Rivera with due diligence.

Payment shall be made into the Registry of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, at Los Angeles, within fourteen days from the date of the filing of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Rivera
473 F.2d 1372 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
473 F.2d 1372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vira-rivera-ca9-1972.