United States v. Rivera

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Rivera

473 F.2d 1372

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 7, 1972

DocketNo. M-72-8049 (72-2441)

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 473 F.2d 1372 (United States v. Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Rivera, 473 F.2d 1372 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After notice and a hearing, Henry W. Sands, a member of the bar of this court, is assessed a penalty of Five Hundred Dollars under Rule 46(c), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, for failure to prosecute the appeal of Vira Rivera with due diligence.

Payment shall be made into the Registry of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, at Los Angeles, within fourteen days from the date of the filing of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

After notice and a hearing, Henry W. Sands, a member of the bar of this court, is assessed a penalty of Five Hundred Dollars under Rule 46(c), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, for failure to prosecute the appeal of Vira Rivera with due diligence.

Payment shall be made into the Registry of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, at Los Angeles, within fourteen days from the date of the filing of this order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

473 F.2d 1372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rivera-ca9-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack