United States v. Rivera

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Rivera

473 F.2d 1372

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 7, 1972·No. No. M-72-8049 (72-2441)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After notice and a hearing, Henry W. Sands, a member of the bar of this court, is assessed a penalty of Five Hundred Dollars under Rule 46(c), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, for failure to prosecute the appeal of Vira Rivera with due diligence.

Payment shall be made into the Registry of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, at Los Angeles, within fourteen days from the date of the filing of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

After notice and a hearing, Henry W. Sands, a member of the bar of this court, is assessed a penalty of Five Hundred Dollars under Rule 46(c), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, for failure to prosecute the appeal of Vira Rivera with due diligence.

Payment shall be made into the Registry of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, at Los Angeles, within fourteen days from the date of the filing of this order.

United States v. Rivera, 473 F.2d 1372 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

473 F.2d 1372 (United States v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related