United States v. Vincent
15 M.J. 613, 1982 CMR LEXIS 756
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review·Decided December 22, 1982·No. NMCM 82 1203·Published
Opinions
For the reasons set forth in the concurring/dissenting opinion, the findings of guilty as to Charge I and the single specification thereunder are set aside. Charge I and the specification thereunder are dismissed. The findings as to Charge II are affirmed. This action necessitates reassessment of the sentence. Upon reassessment, the sentence as adjudged and approved on review below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Vincent, 15 M.J. 613, 1982 CMR LEXIS 756 (usnmcmilrev 1982).
15 M.J. 613 (United States v. Vincent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coolidge v. New Hampshire
403 U.S. 443 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Schlesinger v. Councilman
420 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Brown v. Glines
444 U.S. 348 (Supreme Court, 1980)
The Committee for Gi Rights v. Honorable Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the Army
518 F.2d 466 (D.C. Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Voorhees
4 C.M.A. 509 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1954)
United States v. Stene
7 C.M.A. 277 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1956)
United States v. Lange
15 C.M.A. 486 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1965)
United States v. Harris
5 M.J. 44 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1978)
United States v. Hessler
7 M.J. 9 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1979)
United States v. Fimmano
8 M.J. 197 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1980)