United States v. Villarreal

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Villarreal. Read the opinion of the Court — 324 F.3d 319
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 6, 2003·No. 02-40415·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 24, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

No. 02-40415 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN H. VILLARREAL,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-98-CR-743-ALL --------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender, appointed counsel for Juan

Villarreal, has moved for leave to withdraw in this criminal

appeal following a remand for resentencing and has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). In

response, Villarreal has filed several motions relating to the

appointment of an expert witness to review materials that were

not introduced at trial. Villarreal’s motions are DENIED. Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-40415 -2-

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Villarreal, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Villarreal (United States v. Villarreal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)