United States v. Villarreal

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Villarreal. Read the opinion of the Court — 324 F.3d 319
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 17, 2001·No. 99-40088·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40088 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

GUSTAVO VILLARREAL

Defendant - Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-402-03 -------------------- January 17, 2001

Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Gustavo Villarreal has filed

a motion to withdraw and a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Villarreal has not filed a

response.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw

is GRANTED. Counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Villarreal, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Villarreal (United States v. Villarreal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)