United States v. Victor Barahona

633 F. App'x 596
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 2, 2016
Docket15-7966
StatusUnpublished

This text of 633 F. App'x 596 (United States v. Victor Barahona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Victor Barahona, 633 F. App'x 596 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Victor Barahona appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s refusal to further modify Barahona’s sentence. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234-36 (4th Cir.2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Goodwyn
596 F.3d 233 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
633 F. App'x 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-victor-barahona-ca4-2016.