United States v. Viands
This text of United States v. Viands (United States v. Viands) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6388
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL STEVENSON VIANDS, a/k/a Mike,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00057-JPB-3)
Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 24, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Stevenson Viands, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Michael Stevenson Viands appeals the district court’s
order granting his motion for reduction of sentence filed
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Viands, No. 3:00-cr-00057-JPB-3 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 9, 2009). We
deny Viands’ motion for clarification. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Viands, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-viands-ca4-2009.