United States v. Vernon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7136

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MONSTSHO EUGENE VERNON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:01-cr-00239-HMH-3)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monstsho Eugene Vernon, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Monstsho Eugene Vernon appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §

3582(c)(2) (2006), which sought a reduction in his sentence

based upon Amendment 599 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Vernon, No. 6:01-cr-00239-HMH-3 (D.S.C. Aug. 4, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED