United States v. Vega
This text of United States v. Vega (United States v. Vega) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-40027 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
HECTOR MENA VEGA, also known as Hector Vega,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-354-1 -------------------- August 24, 2000
Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hector
Mena Vega has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mena Vega has not
filed a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw. Our
independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Vega, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vega-ca5-2000.