United States v. Veal

467 F. App'x 232
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2012
DocketNo. 11-7706
StatusPublished

This text of 467 F. App'x 232 (United States v. Veal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Veal, 467 F. App'x 232 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Janison Veal appeals the district court’s orders granting Veal a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying Veal’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Veal No. 3:02-cr-00043-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 1, 2011; Dec. 16, 2011). We also deny Veal’s motion for transcripts at government expense and to proceed on appeal without prepayment of fees as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
467 F. App'x 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-veal-ca4-2012.