United States v. Vasquez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Vasquez. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 F.4th 355
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 12, 2023·No. 22-11177·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 22-11177 Document: 00516782948 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/12/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-11177 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ June 12, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Walter Vasquez,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:22-CR-55-1 ______________________________

Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Walter Vasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vasquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-11177 Document: 00516782948 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/12/2023

No. 22-11177

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Vasquez, (5th Cir. 2023).

United States v. Vasquez (United States v. Vasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)