United States v. Vasquez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Vasquez. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 F.4th 355
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 21, 2021·No. 20-40278·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 20-40278 Document: 00515871265 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/21/2021

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 20-40278 FILED May 21, 2021 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Juan Carlos Vasquez,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 2:13-CR-604-1

Before Smith, Stewart, and Higginson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Vasquez has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vasquez has not filed a response.

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opin- ion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-40278 Document: 00515871265 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/21/2021

No. 20-40278

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non- frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Vasquez, (5th Cir. 2021).

United States v. Vasquez (United States v. Vasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)