United States v. Vargas

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Vargas. Read the opinion of the Court — 408 F. App'x 676
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2010·No. 09-7980·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7980

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

HECTOR VARGAS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (7:01-cr-00096-BR-1)

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hector Vargas, Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Hector Vargas appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Vargas,

No. 7:01-cr-00096-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Vargas, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Vargas (United States v. Vargas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related