United States v. Varela
This text of 144 F. App'x 677 (United States v. Varela) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Marcos Corona Varela appeals his 151-month sentence imposed following a guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We remand to the sentencing court to proceed pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 2005 WL 1964483 at *8 (9th Cir. Aug.17, 2005) (extending the Ameline remand to cases involving non-constitutional Booker error). Further, because the district court did not have the benefit of this Court’s decisions in United States v. Kelly, 2005 WL 2127766 at *6-7 (9th Cir. Sept.6, 2005), and Penuliar v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1037, 1042-44 (9th Cir. 2005), we instruct the district court to consider them upon remand.1
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 F. App'x 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-varela-ca9-2005.