United States v. Varela
This text of United States v. Varela (United States v. Varela) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 21, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41287 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RICARDO VARELA, also know as John Michael Reyes,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-03-CR-481-1 --------------------
Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Ricardo Varela argues for the first time on appeal that the
aggravated felony enhancement found in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is
unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490
(2000). Varela concedes that his argument is foreclosed by
Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he
asserts that Almendarez-Torres has been called into doubt by
Apprendi and he seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme
Court review. We AFFIRM Valera’s conviction and sentence.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-41287 -2-
See United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Varela, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-varela-ca5-2004.