United States v. Valarie E. Reeves

233 F.3d 555, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 29023, 2000 WL 1693434
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 14, 2000
Docket00-1671
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 233 F.3d 555 (United States v. Valarie E. Reeves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Valarie E. Reeves, 233 F.3d 555, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 29023, 2000 WL 1693434 (8th Cir. 2000).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Valarie Reeves entered a conditional plea of guilty to a charge of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. The charges arose from the controlled delivery of a priority mail package addressed to Ms. Reeves that contained the drug. Reeves argues that the initial seizure of the package was not supported by reasonable suspicion. She also asserts that statements made by her after delivery of the package were involuntary, irreparably tainting statements made after her arrest and requiring suppression of those statements.

Having thoroughly reviewed the case, we find no error in the rulings of the District Court1 on these issues. Accord[556]*556ingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in that court’s order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Augustine DeMoss
279 F.3d 632 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Demoss
279 F.3d 632 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Valarie E. Reeves
233 F.3d 555 (Eighth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 F.3d 555, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 29023, 2000 WL 1693434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-valarie-e-reeves-ca8-2000.