United States v. Uzuegbunam

31 F. App'x 215
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 15, 2002·No. 01-8008·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Emmanuel Uzuegbunam appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Uzuegbunam’s motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Uzuegbunam, No. CR-96-43 (E.D.Va. Nov. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be *216 fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Uzuegbunam, 31 F. App'x 215 (4th Cir. 2002).

31 F. App'x 215 (United States v. Uzuegbunam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.