United States v. Uzuegbunam

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 2, 1999·No. 99-6187·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6187

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EMMANUEL UZUEGBUNAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CR-96-43, CA-98-517)

Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: June 2, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Emmanuel Uzuegbunam, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Gerald McBride, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Emmanuel Uzuegbunam seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Uzuegbunam, Nos. CR-

96-43; CA-98-517 (E.D. Va. Feb. 1, 1999). We deny Appellant’s mo-

tion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Uzuegbunam, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Uzuegbunam (United States v. Uzuegbunam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related