United States v. Ussery

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2008·No. 08-7069·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7069

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

REGINALD LAMONT USSERY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:94-cr-00095-F-1)

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 22, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Lamont Ussery, Appellant Pro Se. Felice McConnell Corpening, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Reginald Lamont Ussery appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of

his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we

grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Ussery, No. 5:94-cr-00095-F-1 (E.D.N.C. June 17, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ussery, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Ussery (United States v. Ussery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.