United States v. Ussery
This text of United States v. Ussery (United States v. Ussery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7308
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
REGINALD LAMONT USSERY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-95)
Submitted: January 26, 2006 Decided: February 1, 2006
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Lamont Ussery, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Blaise Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Reginald Lamont Ussery appeals the district court’s
orders denying relief on his motion to compel the government to
file a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion on his behalf and denying his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Ussery, No. CR-94-95
(E.D.N.C. July 12 & 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Ussery, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ussery-ca4-2006.