United States v. Ussery

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ussery

164 F. App'x 411

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 1, 2006·No. No. 05-7308·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Lamont Ussery appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion to compel the government to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion on his behalf and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ussery, No. CR-94-95 (E.D.N.C. July 12 & 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Lamont Ussery appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion to compel the government to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion on his behalf and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ussery, No. CR-94-95 (E.D.N.C. July 12 & 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Ussery, 164 F. App'x 411 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

164 F. App'x 411 (United States v. Ussery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.