United States v. Usdc-Nvr
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 29 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-71408
D.C. No. 3:73-cv-00127-RCJ- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WGC
Petitioner, MEMORANDUM* v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO,
Respondent,
WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION DISTRICT; et al.,
Real Parties in Interest.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Argued January 16, 2015 and Submitted June 29, 2015 San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, M. SMITH, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
The petition of the United States for a writ of mandamus to the district court
is denied without prejudice in light of the opinion handed down in United States v.
U.S. District Court, No. 14-70486.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Usdc-Nvr (United States v. Usdc-Nvr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.