United States v. Usdc-Nvr

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2015·No. 14-71408·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 29 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-71408

D.C. No. 3:73-cv-00127-RCJ- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WGC

Petitioner, MEMORANDUM* v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO,

Respondent,

WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION DISTRICT; et al.,

Real Parties in Interest.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Argued January 16, 2015 and Submitted June 29, 2015 San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, M. SMITH, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

The petition of the United States for a writ of mandamus to the district court

is denied without prejudice in light of the opinion handed down in United States v.

U.S. District Court, No. 14-70486.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Usdc-Nvr, (9th Cir. 2015).

United States v. Usdc-Nvr (United States v. Usdc-Nvr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.