United States v. Under Seal

709 F. App'x 192
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Under Seal. Read the opinion of the Court — 819 F.3d 715
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 22, 2018·No. 17-7020·Unpublished

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) and Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Under Seal, No. 8:97-cr-00193-PWG-10 (D. Md. July 7, 2017). We deny. Appellant’s motions for the production of transcripts at government expense and for reconsideration of our prior order deferring ruling on this motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Under Seal, 709 F. App'x 192 (4th Cir. 2018).

709 F. App'x 192 (United States v. Under Seal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related