United States v. Tyrone Davis

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: July 1, 2024
• Docket: 24-1436
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 24-1436 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Tyrone Davis, also known as Tyrone D. Davis

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________

Submitted: June 26, 2024 Filed: July 1, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Tyrone Davis appeals after the district court1 denied his motion for a sentence reduction under Guidelines Amendment 821. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

1 The Honorable Stephen R. Clark, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. See United States v. Tollefson, 853 F.3d 481, 485 (8th Cir. 2017) (standard of review). The court’s Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction demonstrates that it was aware of and considered the relevant factors, including the sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Rodd, 966 F.3d 740, 748 (8th Cir. 2020).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm. ______________________________

-2-