United States v. Tynae K. Lester, Also Known as Gabriel Quiles

200 F.3d 1179
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided March 7, 2000·No. 98-4153·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinions

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Tynae K. Lester appeals from an order directing him to pay restitution in the amount of $138,041.40. We decline to review Mr. Lester’s arguments because in his plea agreement with the government he specifically undertook “to pay any restitution ordered by the District Court.” We have held several times that a defendant’s agreement to pay the restitution that a district court orders is binding. See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 128 F.3d 1239, 1240 (8th Cir.1997), and United States v. Marsh, 932 F.2d 710, 713 (8th Cir.1991). Such agreements are in fact specifically authorized by statute: 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(3) states that “[t]he court may ... order restitution in any criminal case to the extent agreed to by the parties in a plea agreement.”

[1180] Because Mr. Lester’s agreement bars this appeal, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tynae K. Lester, Also Known as Gabriel Quiles, 200 F.3d 1179 (8th Cir. 2000).

200 F.3d 1179 (United States v. Tynae K. Lester, Also Known as Gabriel Quiles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Timothy Beston, Jr.
43 F.4th 867 (Eighth Circuit, 2022)
United States v. Paul Hansmeier
988 F.3d 428 (Eighth Circuit, 2021)
United States v. Elena Polukhin
896 F.3d 848 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)
United States v. Smith
528 F.3d 423 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Shaun Joseph Ruff
420 F.3d 772 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Mark Fuehrer
46 F. App'x 377 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Lam
Fifth Circuit, 2000