United States v. Tynae K. Lester, Also Known as Gabriel Quiles
This text of 200 F.3d 1179 (United States v. Tynae K. Lester, Also Known as Gabriel Quiles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Tynae K. Lester appeals from an order directing him to pay restitution in the amount of $138,041.40. We decline to review Mr. Lester’s arguments because in his plea agreement with the government he specifically undertook “to pay any restitution ordered by the District Court.” We have held several times that a defendant’s agreement to pay the restitution that a district court orders is binding. See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 128 F.3d 1239, 1240 (8th Cir.1997), and United States v. Marsh, 932 F.2d 710, 713 (8th Cir.1991). Such agreements are in fact specifically authorized by statute: 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(3) states that “[t]he court may ... order restitution in any criminal case to the extent agreed to by the parties in a plea agreement.”
[1180]*1180Because Mr. Lester’s agreement bars this appeal, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 F.3d 1179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tynae-k-lester-also-known-as-gabriel-quiles-ca8-2000.