United States v. Twyman
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
David Allen Twyman appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction and has filed a motion for a transcript at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Twyman’s motion and affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Twyman, 3:10-cr-00050-JPB-DJJ-2 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
476 F. App'x 416 (United States v. Twyman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.