United States v. Turner

300 F. App'x 189
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Turner. Read the opinion of the Court — 241 F. App'x 168
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 10, 2008·No. 08-6640·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pam Turner appeals the district court’s order granting in part her motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000), seeking a reduction in her sentence based on an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines. Although the district court granted Turner’s motion, it reduced her sentence for distribution of cocaine base from 180 months’ imprisonment to 145 months, rather than the requested 121 months. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion or other reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (motion under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the district court”); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir.2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Turner, 300 F. App'x 189 (4th Cir. 2008).

300 F. App'x 189 (United States v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Bryant Legree
205 F.3d 724 (Fourth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Anthony Goines
357 F.3d 469 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)