United States v. Tucker
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7297
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KENNETH WAYNE TUCKER, a/k/a Kenneth Nathaniel Tucker, a/k/a Kenneth N. Tucker,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:07-cr-00098-HEH-1)
Submitted: August 25, 2009 Decided: September 11, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Wayne Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Wayne Tucker appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction
of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Tucker, No. 3:07-cr-00098-
HEH-1 (E.D. Va. June 13, 2008). We grant Tucker’s motion to
withdraw his motion to stay. Further, we grant Tucker’s motion
to amend his informal brief and deny his motions for a
transcript and appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Tucker (United States v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.