United States v. Tucker

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Tucker. Read the opinion of the Court — 200 F. App'x 195
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2009·No. 08-7297·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7297

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH WAYNE TUCKER, a/k/a Kenneth Nathaniel Tucker, a/k/a Kenneth N. Tucker,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:07-cr-00098-HEH-1)

Submitted: August 25, 2009 Decided: September 11, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Wayne Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Wayne Tucker appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction

of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Tucker, No. 3:07-cr-00098-

HEH-1 (E.D. Va. June 13, 2008). We grant Tucker’s motion to

withdraw his motion to stay. Further, we grant Tucker’s motion

to amend his informal brief and deny his motions for a

transcript and appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tucker, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Tucker (United States v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related