United States v. Tucker

680 F. App'x 786
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Tucker. Read the opinion of the Court — 596 F. App'x 616
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided March 15, 2017·No. 16-6310·Unpublished

Opinion

ORDER RESCINDING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *

Carolyn B. McHugh, Circuit Judge.

On February 22, 2017, we issued an Order Denying in Part and Granting in Part Certificate of Appealability, in which we granted a certificate of appealability as to “[w]hether, post-Johnson [v. United States, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015) ], Mr. Tucker’s conviction under Oklahoma law for discharge of a firearm into a dwelling constitutes a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a).” That same day, we issued an order appointing counsel to represent Mr. Tucker, and setting a supplemental briefing schedule.

On March 6, 2017, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Beckles v. United States, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 886, 197 L.Ed.2d 145, 2017 WL 855781 (March 6, 2017). In light of that opinion, we have *787 determined that the aforementioned certificate of appealability was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we RESCIND the certificate of appealability issued on February 22, 2017, and DISMISS this appeal.

*

This order is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tucker, 680 F. App'x 786 (10th Cir. 2017).

680 F. App'x 786 (United States v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. United States
576 U.S. 591 (Supreme Court, 2015)
Beckles v. United States
580 U.S. 256 (Supreme Court, 2017)