United States v. Troy Burton

327 F. App'x 666
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedJune 29, 2009
Docket08-3300
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 327 F. App'x 666 (United States v. Troy Burton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Troy Burton, 327 F. App'x 666 (7th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

Troy Burton was sentenced as an Armed Career Criminal and is serving 180 months in prison, the statutory minimum, for possessing a firearm as a felon. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(e)(1). Burton moved to have his sentence reduced pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) because, he says, Amendment 709 to the sentencing *667 guidelines entitles him to a lower sentence. See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(2), Supp. to App. C 235 (2008) (Amendment 709). The district court denied the motion.

Amendment 709 was not made retroactive by the Sentencing Commission and is not a ground for reduction under § 3582(c)(2). United States v. Alexander, 553 F.3d 591, 593 (7th Cir.2009). More importantly, Amendment 709, which altered the rules for calculating criminal history under the Sentencing Guidelines, has no relevance to the determination whether a defendant qualifies as an Armed Career

Criminal. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.4 cmt. no. 1; United States v. Hobbs, 136 F.3d 384, 388 (4th Cir.1998); United States v. Wright, 48 F.3d 254, 255-56 (7th Cir.1995). Even if the amendment had been made retroactive, it could not have benefited Burton.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ALSTON v. United States
S.D. Indiana, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
327 F. App'x 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-troy-burton-ca7-2009.