United States v. Trollinger
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-50145 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GARY L. TROLLINGER,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-95-CR-94 - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Gary L. Trollinger appeals his conditional guilty-plea
conviction for felon in possession of a firearm in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He argues that Congress exceeded its
authority under the Commerce Clause and the Tenth Amendment in
enacting § 922(g)(1). Trollinger’s claims are without merit. We
have held that § 922(g)(1) is constitutionally valid under the
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-50145 - 2 -
Commerce Clause. United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240 (5th Cir.
1996). As to the Tenth Amendment claim, Trollinger has not
demonstrated error, plain or otherwise. United States v. Olano,
507 U.S. 725, 731-37 (1993).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Trollinger (United States v. Trollinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.