United States v. Tracy Vaughn
This text of 668 F. App'x 204 (United States v. Tracy Vaughn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tracy Vaughn appeals after the district court 1 denied his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). After careful de novo review of the record, we find no reason to reverse the district court’s denial of Vaughn’s motion for a sentence reduction. See United States v. Logan, 710 F.3d 856, 857 (8th Cir. 2013) (appeals court reviews de novo district court’s determination that movant was not eligible for reduction under § 3582(c)(2)).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and Vaughn’s pro se objection to submission of this appeal without oral argument is denied.
. The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
668 F. App'x 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tracy-vaughn-ca8-2016.