United States v. Tracy Vaughn

668 F. App'x 204
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 24, 2016·No. 16-1060·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tracy Vaughn appeals after the district court 1 denied his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). After careful de novo review of the record, we find no reason to reverse the district court’s denial of Vaughn’s motion for a sentence reduction. See United States v. Logan, 710 F.3d 856, 857 (8th Cir. 2013) (appeals court reviews de novo district court’s determination that movant was not eligible for reduction under § 3582(c)(2)).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and Vaughn’s pro se objection to submission of this appeal without oral argument is denied.

1

. The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tracy Vaughn, 668 F. App'x 204 (8th Cir. 2016).

668 F. App'x 204 (United States v. Tracy Vaughn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Elnora Logan
710 F.3d 856 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)